

There was a time when producing more content was an advantage. More blogs. More posts. More videos. More campaigns. Then generative AI arrived and made “more” almost effortless. Today, a brand can produce a month’s worth of social posts before lunch. Ten product descriptions can become fifty. A blog can be outlined, written, edited and published before the strategy meeting is over. And somewhere between efficiency and excess, the internet started filling up with something people now have a name for:
AI slop.
The term generally refers to low-effort, mass-produced AI content created primarily to capture attention, clicks or revenue rather than provide meaningful value. It has become so widespread that “slop” was named Merriam-Webster’s 2025 Word of the Year. The problem for brands isn’t that audiences hate AI. The problem is that audiences are getting better at recognising content that feels like it came from nowhere. And when everything starts sounding polished, generic and strangely familiar, the things that become valuable are the things AI cannot manufacture on its own:
Scroll through almost any social platform and you can see the symptoms. Perfectly rendered people with six fingers. Restaurants advertising food that doesn’t quite look edible. Generic LinkedIn posts about “unlocking your potential.” Articles that say everything and nothing. Videos with synthetic voices explaining subjects nobody asked about. Some of it is funny. Some of it is impressive. Much of it is forgettable.
By late 2025, researchers and media reports were already documenting the scale of the problem. One study reported that more than 20% of videos shown to new YouTube users were AI-generated “SLOP.”
This is where the distinction between content production and content creation matters. AI is extraordinarily good at helping marketers produce things.
It can:
Those are useful capabilities.
But ask AI:
Those answers live somewhere else. They live inside your business. Inside your people. Inside your customers. Inside the experiences that happened before anyone opened ChatGPT. That’s where distinctive content begins.
Stories contain details. And details create credibility. “Customer satisfaction improved significantly” sounds like marketing. “Three months after switching, our support team stopped spending every Friday afternoon manually reconciling customer complaints” sounds like someone actually lived through it.
That difference matters.
A human story gives an audience:
AI can help you structure that story. It shouldn’t invent the experience.
The answer isn’t to throw AI out of the marketing department. That would be like throwing away spreadsheets because someone started making bad presentations with them. The answer is to establish a clear line between where AI helps and where humans lead.
Let AI help with research, outlines, repurposing, transcription, analysis and production support. But keep human ownership over:
The tool can accelerate the process. The thinking still needs an owner.
Your best content may already exist inside your organisation.
Interview:
Ask them questions that can’t be answered by a content generator.
Those answers are content gold.
Don’t write: “We are industry leaders.”
Show the work.
Don’t say: “Our team understands the market.”
Explain what you learned from working in it.
Don’t say:
“Customer experience is our priority.”
Tell us about the customer problem that forced you to change your process.
Proof beats adjectives.
Every business has stories. Most simply haven’t documented them.
Create a repository of:
This becomes an original source of content that competitors cannot replicate with a prompt.
Your brand should not sound like a committee. Let subject matter experts explain what they know in their own language. A cybersecurity expert shouldn’t sound like a copywriter. A founder shouldn’t sound like a press release. A doctor shouldn’t sound like an Instagram caption generator. Their expertise and personality are part of the content.
There is another reason this matters for SEO. When content production becomes cheap, originality becomes a stronger differentiator. Google’s current guidance explicitly encourages content that demonstrates experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trustworthiness. It also asks creators to consider who created the content, how it was produced, and why it exists in the first place.
That doesn’t mean every article needs a photograph of its author sitting beside a laptop. It means the content should give readers a reason to believe that the people behind it know what they are talking about.
The future isn’t human versus machine. It is human with a machine. AI can help a strategist analyse thousands of reviews. It can help a writer find patterns across interviews. It can help a designer explore directions. It can help a content team turn one expert conversation into ten useful formats. But someone still has to decide:
Those are human decisions. And increasingly, they are the decisions that audiences will value most.
The internet doesn’t need another 500-word article explaining that “digital transformation is changing the world.” It needs someone who has actually transformed something. It doesn’t need another founder post about resilience. It needs a founder who can tell us what failure actually looked like. It doesn’t need another AI-generated image of a perfect office with people smiling at a laptop. It needs a real employee who can explain what changed when the company finally fixed the problem everyone had been complaining about.
AI has made content cheaper. It has made content faster. It has made content almost limitless. And that is precisely why human stories are becoming more valuable.
At Par Marketing, our team believes technology should make better marketing possible, not make every brand sound the same. Our human-first approach (by a team of critical thinkers, strategists, executors, makers and checkers) combines strategy, research, technology and creative thinking with the people, experiences and insights that make each brand different. Because in a world overflowing with content, the brands worth remembering will be the ones that still have something real to say.
AI slop refers to low-effort, mass-produced AI-generated content created primarily to capture attention, clicks or revenue rather than provide meaningful value. It can include generic articles, social posts, images, videos and other content that lacks originality, context or a clear human perspective.
As AI makes content production faster and more accessible, audiences are exposed to more generic and repetitive content. Human experiences, original opinions, expert insights and real stories can help brands stand out and build greater credibility and trust.
Not necessarily. The issue is not whether AI was used, but whether the final content provides genuine value. AI can support research, ideation, editing and content production, while humans should remain responsible for strategy, accuracy, expertise, storytelling and editorial decisions.
Brands can avoid AI slop by grounding content in first-hand experience, original research, expert opinions, customer stories and specific examples. AI can be used as a production tool, but the ideas, evidence and perspective should come from people who understand the subject.
Human-first content can strengthen E-E-A-T by demonstrating real experience, expertise and credibility. Original research, expert commentary, named authors, case studies, first-hand observations and reliable sources give audiences and search systems stronger signals about the value and trustworthiness of the content.
A human-first content strategy uses technology to improve efficiency while keeping people at the centre of strategy and storytelling. It focuses on real experiences, expert knowledge, customer insights and distinctive brand perspectives instead of relying on generic, mass-produced content.
October 1, 2026





Click any AI below — it opens with this article's prompt already loaded. Just press Enter.